Practical Implementation of NIST 800-172 Enhanced Security Requirements for CMMC Level 3

Digital puzzle pieces on a black backgroud

As the cyber threat landscape becomes increasingly dominated by state-sponsored actors and advanced persistent threats, the DoD has taken critical steps to evolve its cybersecurity requirements for defense contractors.

For contractors handling Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) and seeking to achieve CMMC Level 3, the NIST SP 800-172 Enhanced Security Requirements represent the most stringent technical and procedural benchmarks currently required in the Department of Defense (DOD) Industrial Base (DIB).

This article examines the practical application of NIST 800-172 controls, focusing on the advanced security capabilities, resilience engineering, and operational maturity required for high-trust environments.

 

Read More

Compliance Platforms and the Path to SOC 2 Attestation

Wheel of icons aroud a lock being touched by a man in a suit

The journey toward SOC 2 can feel daunting: fragmented documentation, unclear control mapping, and labor-intensive evidence collection often slow progress and increase audit risk. That’s where compliance platforms come in.

These technology-driven solutions promise to streamline the entire SOC 2 process, from readiness assessments and control implementation to continuous monitoring and audit preparation. However, with so many platforms claiming to simplify compliance, most businesses ask two questions: Do I need a platform, and which one is right for me?

This article explores compliance platforms’ role in managing SOC 2 requirements, what capabilities matter most, and how they compare to traditional audit preparation methods. 

 

Read More

Automapping CMMC Practices to NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP: Challenges and Strategies

Network of abstract locks in hexagons.

Automapping CMMC practices to other compliance frameworks such as NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP is an attractive option for security teams managing complex regulatory landscapes. On paper, many of these frameworks cover overlapping domains: access control, audit logging, incident response, risk assessment, and system configuration management. 

However, the practical reality of automating reveals significant challenges that require deep architectural strategies, not surface-level crosswalks.

To build an effective automapping solution, organizations must address fundamental differences in structure, intent, and evolution across these frameworks and recognize that simple one-to-one mappings often miss critical nuances essential for proper compliance.

 

Read More