Using Your MSP to FedRAMP Authorization Time Through Control Inheritance

Hands holding a tablet, in front of which there is an abstract wheel with symbols related to digital technology and security.

A FedRAMP Moderate baseline, now classified as Class C under the updated FedRAMP 20x framework, requires documentation and validation of over 300 controls–not an insignificant number, regardless of the enterprise. 

Modern IT, however, rests on a network of digital infrastructure and vendor-supplied applications. If your app runs on a FedRAMP-authorized infrastructure provider, you benefit from the fact that those providers have already invested years and tens of millions of dollars in proving the security of systems to a Third Party Assessment Organization (3PAO). 

By maximizing your Customer Responsibility Matrix (CRM) and building an inheritance-first architecture, organizations can offload their documentation and assessment burden to their underlying provider, reducing total time-to-ATO by 30% or more

 

Read More

Navigating FedRAMP’s Move to Certification Classes 

A blue digital lock in a red circle on an abstract digital landscape

Anchored by the FedRAMP Authorization Act and OMB Memo M-24-15, FedRAMP is undergoing a major change that affects virtually every aspect of how cloud service providers pursue, achieve, and maintain federal authorization. Named FedRAMP 20x, this program is meant to streamline compliance and make it easier for cloud products to enter the federal marketplace.

The most visible of those changes is the retirement of the legacy FIPS 199 security categories (Low, Moderate, and High) in favor of a new alphabetical system: Certification Classes A through D.

We’re walking through these new classes and what they mean for agencies seeking Authorization.

 

Read More

What is the Duty of Care in Cybersecurity?

Hands typing on a laptop with digital symbols above them, primarily a glowing shield with a keyhole in it.

Data privacy and security are often framed as organizational requirements, and as such include discussions of ROI, staffing, compliance, and so on. However, the obligations enterprises and agencies face in protecting data extend beyond liability, because the data they protect often represents someone’s life and well-being. 

As a result, duty of care is evolving from a legal obligation into a defining principle of governance. The organizations that recognize this shift are reframing risk management as such an obligation. 

 

Read More