Manual evidence collection slows teams down and introduces risk. Every audit cycle turns into a scramble for screenshots, exports, and documents. Each framework adds another layer of repetition. The same control might need to be proven three or four times in slightly different ways. The result? Wasted time, outdated evidence, and frustrated compliance teams. 

There’s a better way to manage evidence: automate it and connect it all to a single source of truth. This approach turns a reactive process into a continuous, reliable, scalable system.

Read More

For decades, compliance has meant preparing for an audit, gathering evidence, reviewing documentation, and waiting for the auditor’s assessment. It’s a cycle that drains resources, disrupts operations, and often delivers results that are already outdated the moment they’re published. That’s where continuous assurance comes in. 

Rather than treating compliance as a point-in-time exercise, continuous assurance integrates automation, monitoring, and analytics to provide ongoing, real-time evidence that controls are in place and effective. 

It’s a shift with wide-ranging implications for how organizations manage risk, prepare for audits, and build trust with regulators and customers.

Read More

Automapping CMMC Practices to NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP: Challenges and Strategies

Automapping CMMC practices to other compliance frameworks such as NIST 800-53, ISO 27001, and FedRAMP is an attractive option for security teams managing complex regulatory landscapes. On paper, many of these frameworks cover overlapping domains: access control, audit logging, incident response, risk assessment, and system configuration management. 

However, the practical reality of automating reveals significant challenges that require deep architectural strategies, not surface-level crosswalks.

To build an effective automapping solution, organizations must address fundamental differences in structure, intent, and evolution across these frameworks and recognize that simple one-to-one mappings often miss critical nuances essential for proper compliance.

Read More